Technically Speaking, February, 2005

From the Editor’s Desk

Last month’s newsletter included an article by William Sarubbi, MBA, CMT entitled, “First-ofthe-Month Bias Continued.” This short research piece updated some work originally done by Arthur Merrill, CMT. Shortly after that issue was sent to the publisher, Arthur Merrill passed away. We are fortunate that he left us with a lifetime of work to update, and due to the statistical rigor he applied to indicators, we should expect to find that his work is just as valid today as it was when he undertook his efforts.

In this month’s newsletter, we present some  insight to the great life Arthur lived. Next month, we hope to be able to publish a very small amount of his original work. Arthur tested more ideas than most of us will have in our lifetimes. Robert Colby, CMT, is an authority on indicators, having written an extremely detailed book on the subject, The Encyclopedia of Technical Market Indicators. In that book, Arthur Merrill is cited 23 times in the index, more than twice as often as any other individual, and second only to Ned Davis Research, an entire company dedicated to market research.

We also have a summary of the recent brainstorming session in San Diego and a biography of Garfield Drew along with examples of several indicators and their applications to the stock market. We hope you enjoy this issue.

Cordially,
Mike Carr, CMT
Technically Speaking Editor

What's Inside...

What an Honour

Talk about market timing. To be able to address you as President in my first column when the MTA and...

Read More

Mission Accomplished

I hesitate to use that headline because of the obvious political overtones. But I cannot think of more appropriate words...

Read More

Two Tributes to Arthur Merrill, CMT (1906-2005)

Bob Prechter, CMT, summed up the life of this great man in a poignant memory:

“Arthur Merrill, a pioneer of...

Read More

“Information Memo New York Stock Exchange, Inc. 20 Broad Street New York, NY 10005 Member Firm Regulation Number 05-9 January 31, 2005

SUBJECT: RULE 344 – RESEARCH ANALYST QUALIFICATION EXAMINATION (“SERIES 86/87”) FOR TECHNICAL RESEARCH ANALYSTS

The New York Stock Exchange has...

Read More

Garfield Albee Drew

“Simplicity or singleness of approach is a greatly under-estimated factor of market success.”

“Stocks don’t sell for what they are...

Read More

Garfield Drew on Odd Lot Indicators

Drew disagreed with the popular misconception, highlighted by the media, that odd lot investors were “always wrong.” He advocated a...

Read More

The Rate of Change (ROC) Indicator

The Rate of Change (ROC) indicator calculates the difference between the current price and the price at some point in...

Read More

Snowbound in San Diego with the MTA

Over the weekend of January 21-23 the MTA hosted it first annual mid-winter retreat in warm and sunny San Diego,...

Read More

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) of the Chartered Market Technician (CMTSM) Program

These Frequently Asked Questions include information about the CMT exams and program, as well as study advice for all levels,...

Read More

CMT Stats

As of January 31, 2005 there are 342 people who have received the CMT designation. Of this number, 47 have...

Read More

What an Honour

Talk about market timing. To be able to address you as President in my first column when the MTA and the CMT are literally on the dawn of a new professional era, well, it is indeed an honour. There is much to be said about what lies in front of us and over the forthcoming months, all these conversations will be had. For now, I want to simply thank two people from our organization, without whom, this monumental announcement from the NYSE would simply not have come to fruition: Ralph Acampora and John Kirby. Without Ralph’s energy, vision, idea and heart, we would not have had this decision. Without the outstanding strategies, insight and organization from John Kirby, we would not have had this decision. If you think that the NYSE decision is good for technical analysts, good for the MTA, good for the CMT, please thank both of these gentlemen.

On another note, I am also very encouraged by our Board…John Kosar is now our VP (after serving successfully as our Secretary and Treasurer for the last three years). We also welcome Larry Berman aboard as our Treasurer (he is the past President of the CSTA, and is the Vice Chairman – Americas, for IFTA.). Larry is also the first living outside of the USA to be on the Board. Just as our membership continues to grow abroad, it is nice that our Board is also extending its borders (aside from being involved with the MTA since 1996, I am also Canadian and was once the President of the CSTA).

The wind is at our back. Welcome to the Golden Age for Technical Analysis. We are just getting started.

Sincerely,
Jordan E. Kotick, CMT
MTA President

Contributor(s)

Jordan Kotick, CMT

Bio Coming Soon.

Mission Accomplished

I hesitate to use that headline because of the obvious political overtones. But I cannot think of more appropriate words to describe what the MTA has done or a group that is more deserving of this victory.

By now you probably know that the NYSE has filed a rule interpretation with the SEC that recognizes CMT 1 and CMT 2 as an alternative to the Series 86 examination required for all financial analysts employed by member firms. Without this  exemption, many of you would have had to take an exam that was entirely irrelevant to the practice of your profession. However, the significance of this recognition of the CMT and the MTA by the NYSE is far broader than that. The text of the initial memo from NYSE is reprinted below. But the more important words were in the 28 page document filed with the SEC.

It said in part… “Exchange staff believes that it is appropriate and consistent with its regulatory objectives to provide exemptive relief to technical analysts similar to that which has been provided to fundamental analysts…The series 86 exam was developed by NYSE and NASD staffs in conjunction with a committee of fundamental analysts and is intended to test fundamental securities analysts. This is quite clear from the exams Study Outline. Technical analysis is quite different from fundamental and therefore such analysts should not unnecessarily be subjected to taking an examination when there is a superior alternative to demonstrate competency.”

It goes on to say that… “the Exchange reviewed descriptions of the subject matter that is covered on the CMT examination and compared it to the subject matter on the Series 86 examination. The results of the review indicate that the subject matter is different and confirms that the work of a technical analyst is distinctly different from the work process and product of a fundamental analyst. In addition, staff has analyzed the process in which the MTA has developed its examination and is satisfied that it meets generally accepted test development procedures. The exchange believes that investors will be better served by proposing a qualification standard directly applicable to persons preparing technical research reports which will demonstrate their competency based on the work functions and knowledge needed to perform such functions.”

… “In sum, the MTA with its professional consultants have subjected the examination to standard testing practices that the Exchange believes sufficient to allow it to be used to provide an exemption for the Series 86 examination. This is evidenced by the fact that the MTA has been conducting job analysis studies updating the CMT examinations periodically and involving content experts in such studies and updates of the examinations. Such activities conform to the Standards for Educational and Psychological testing (1999), which were developed jointly by the American Psychological Association (APA), the American Educational Research Association (AERA) and the National Council on Measurement in Education (NCME). These same standards are followed for the development and maintenance of NYSE qualification examinations.”

And finally,“… the proposed rule change is effective upon filing …in that the proposed rule change constitutes a stated policy, practice or interpretation with respect to the meaning, administration or enforcement of an existing rule.

The text of the initial memo is in the column to the right for those who may have missed it. Over the last year MTA has engaged In a campaign that is documented in at least 10 exchanges of formal documents and many conference calls and face-to-face meetings by dedicated volunteers.

If you would like a copy of this documentation, please let me know. I’d be happy to send it along to you. Please be sure your email box is large. There are many, many pages.

Sincerely,
John Kirby

Contributor(s)

John R. Kirby

Bio Coming

Two Tributes to Arthur Merrill, CMT (1906-2005)

Bob Prechter, CMT, summed up the life of this great man in a poignant memory:

“Arthur Merrill, a pioneer of technical analysis, died on January 4, 2005 at the age of 98. I will always be grateful to Arthur for hosting my wife and me in the basement of his home for numerous hours in 1978 and 1979 while we photographed over 300 hand-prepared illustrations for our books, Elliott Wave Principle and R.N. Elliott’s Masterworks. Arthur developed the photos in his darkroom, saving us the money we didn’t have to spend on book production. He also gave me invaluable advice about the virtues of owning one’s specialty books rather than going through an established publisher, to better insure a long-term success. Arthur’s wife Elsie was always impeccably cordial. Arthur authored many small books, which he published on his own press. He investigated seasonal patterns and the Wave Principle and wrote Filtered Waves, describing a method of filtering data to cull essential market movements. An engineer by training and profession, Arthur always commanded great respect among professional technicians. His personality was immensely pleasant, and his memory will always evoke a smile.”

Previously, Bob had commented that, “Arthur’s most intriguing characteristic is his combination of open mindedness and closed mindedness. He is open minded in being willing to explore any idea which would be construed as reasonable, yet closed minded with regard to the fact that he requires statistical proof before relying on anyone’s assumptions about the effectiveness of an indicator.”

Art earned his CMT in 1989, at the age of 83. Phil Roth, CMT, as MTA president at that time signed Arthur’s CMT certificate and was honored to attend the memorial service conducted for him on January 15, 2005, in Chester Springs, PA. Phil said, “It was a wonderful service, with his daughter and two granddaughters speaking. Art was 98-1/2 years old when he passed away and, according to his grandson, still perfectly lucid even though he had suffered a stroke some weeks earlier. The family made a display of some of is memorabilia, and I am glad to say, some of his proudest possessions were his technical analysis work. His CMT certificate was prominently displayed right next to his Harvard MBA degree, granted in 1929.”

Current MTA Director Duke Jones, CMT, credits Art Merrill with being a big influence in the way he views our craft. Duke observed that, “Art was one of my favorites because to me he expressed the attributes of real genius; he was able to take a complicated matter and explain it in simple terms. He had a passion for learning that I venture never waned as it was rumored that he was working on a new book before his health deteriorated.

In my mind, Art embodied the characteristics of a true technician; he was both student and teacher. It was evident in his presentations that he truly loved the challenge of the markets and that the journey was as much fun as the destination. If you have never explored Art’s work I would suggest you put in on your reading list. I will miss his work but also he as a model of passion and curiosity.”

Finally, Bob Nurock expressed all of our feelings back in 1991 when he said, “If technical analysis is ‘an art as well as a science’ he is the Art who brought us the science.”

On the occasion of Arthur’s 85th birthday, several of his colleagues described their involvement with him, and their impressions of him. Below we reproduce the thoughts of John McGinley, CMT.

I often tell people that if Arthur Merrill doesn’t have the world’s greatest personality, he’s in the top two. In this tribute to Arthur and his work, I would be remiss not to put that first. It’s a real treat to meet him, with his impish eyes, shy smile, and eager curiosity. And he doesn’t have a judgmental word in his vocabulary. For instance, the phrase he uses for the elderly is old timers. My wife says “take a lesson!”

In all the years I’ve known him, I’ve never seen him mad; don’t know anyone who has. He told me one time he got mad; the local bank he’d used for eons told him he was depositing too many checks! In the mail order business (newsletter)? What did the man expect? Arthur took his business across the street that very minute.

Arthur had an interest in the market long before he retired after 33 years with GE. RW Schabaker’s book, the predecessor to Edwards & Magee, was his bible. He bought a used offset press and started Technical Trends in 1960 (sold the press two years ago when he moved to Haverford, PA to be near his daughter).

“He is a treasure to our profession and his career should be a beacon and example to all who follow”

John McGinley

It was not until he published his classic book, Behavior of Prices on Wall Street, that he became known, and his weekly market indicator service, Technical Trends, more than just a hobby. He tells people he retired from GE to start his newsletter and hasn’t worked a day since! He drew the charts, photographed them, developed the film, made the press masters, cut the paper and ran the press every Saturday for 27 years. He then collated, folded, stapled, stuffed and mailed the envelopes. Many was the time his wife Elsie would drive to catch the last post office truck while Arthur was in the back seat furiously stuffing envelopes.

Arthur always got up at 5 a.m. and had more work done by 9 a.m. than most of us do in a day. It paid off because his research was exhaustive. He checked every trading day back to the turn of the century for relevance, by hand! His classic, Behavior of Prices on Wall Street, was entirely calculated by hand, without even a hand calculator. Why? Because they didn’t exist! He always got his hands dirty, did it the hard way. And look at the results he uncovered: no one else had ever looked at the market data with such a microscope, in such detail.

Arthur’s healthy disregard for anecdotal evidence and Wall Street “Wisdom” led him to investigate all sorts of indicators. His pioneering approaches and novel application of solid statistical rigor to market research was at once innovative and revealing. Other than discovering the then surprising fact that Fridays were usually up and Mondays down, I once asked him what was his most surprising discovery; “the day before the holiday syndrome,” he replied.

Do it the hard way? He sat down one summer to bang into the computer the Dow Industrials hourly plus volume for twenty years! He got a tape recorder and listened to books on tape while his fingers were inputting the data. He went to the New York Public Library once to get the data on all full moons to see if there was any measurable stock market effects (he found none). At one point he punched holes into blank movie film, to simulate the Dow. When he pulled it through a gadget he built – with switches which sensed the holes – he could test an indicator against the Dow simply by running the film thru the machine. 

People often wonder how he comes up with his indicators and ideas, so ingenious and unique. First, he has a steel-trap mind. Long a member of Mensa, when Intertel was started (Mensa is the top 2% of IQs, Intertel is the top 1%), they asked him if  he’d like to apply. He thought it over, got out his original Mensa test from years ago and sent it in. They mailed him back a certificate immediately! (By the way, if you joined Mensa over the last 20 years or so, he probably lettered your certificate.)

Second, he takes nothing for granted. He checks everything – in detail. I often tried to suggest shortcuts, but he’d not have it. I did get him to buy his first computer (the data for his two books was compiled by hand!), a programmable calculator (a TI), and later encouraged him to get a real computer (he chose a Radio Shack because of the rapid repair they could do, which he desperately needed from time to time).

Third, he had a great curiosity and a fertile imagination as well as an innate understanding of  what makes markets tick. Plus, he rules nothingout, automatically. He seems to have no biases at all. Of course, he just rolls his eyes at the Super Bowl indicator, or the “snow on the ground in Boston on Christmas” indicator.

I worked at Arthur’s feet every Saturday night from 1982 until he retired at the end of 1987 – and value every minute of it beyond measure. He’s a great researcher, a good friend, a valued teacher, has a singular personality, and been a unique pioneer in the field of technical analysis from its early days. He is a treasure to our profession and his career should be a beacon and example to all who follow.

John McGinley

One Additional Rememberance

In 1986 Art Merrill gave me a copy of his book, Remembering Names – a perfect gift to someone who could never remember anyone’s name.

I have always cherished this little book and especially the wonderful inscription inside – note the little hearts.

Thank you, Art.
Barbara Gomperts

Contributor(s)

Arthur Merrill, CMT

Bio Coming

Robert Prechter, CMT

Robert Prechter is CEO of Elliott Wave International, an independent market analysis firm. He is also Founder of Socionomics Institute. Robert has written 20 books on finance, beginning with Elliott Wave Principle in 1978, which predicted a 1920s-style stock market boom. His 2002 title, Conquer...

John R. McGinley, CMT

John R. McGinley, CMT is Editor of TECHNICAL TRENDS, the Indicator Accuracy Service. For more information, please contact John at jmcgoo@post.harvard.edu or 203-762-0229.

Barbara I. Gomperts

Barbara Gomperts was the long-time production coordinator for Technically Speaking, among other marketing and publication-related functions, working out of Marblehead, MA.

“Information Memo New York Stock Exchange, Inc. 20 Broad Street New York, NY 10005 Member Firm Regulation Number 05-9 January 31, 2005

SUBJECT: RULE 344 – RESEARCH ANALYST QUALIFICATION EXAMINATION (“SERIES 86/87”) FOR TECHNICAL RESEARCH ANALYSTS

The New York Stock Exchange has submitted a rule filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission to provide for an alternative qualification standard for Part I (Series 86) of the Research Analyst Qualification Examination for analysts that prepare technical research reports. This alternative is similar to the CFA exemption approved by the SEC (see NYSE Information Memo 04-16, dated April 1, 2004). The exemption would permit research analysts who have passed Levels I and II of the  Chartered Market Technician (“CMT”) Program and who only prepare technical research reports, to obtain an exemption from the Series 86 examination. Similar to the CFA exemption, an analyst granted an exemption from the Series 86 examination will be qualified as a Research Analyst only after passing Part II (Series 87) of the Research Analyst Qualification Examination and the prerequisite examination (i.e., Series 7, 17, 37/38 examinations).

Technical Research Analysts will have to qualify as research analysts by April 4, 2005.

Further information regarding the process and manner in which these analysts may seek this exemption will be provided in a future information memo.

Questions regarding this Memo may be directed to Williams Jannace at 212-656-2744 or Douglas G. Preston at 212-656-4358.

Donald van Weezel
Vice President
Member Firm Regulation”

Contributor(s)

Garfield Albee Drew

“Simplicity or singleness of approach is a greatly under-estimated factor of market success.”

“Stocks don’t sell for what they are worth, but for what people think they are worth.”

– Garfield Drew

As demonstrated in the pithy wisdom quoted above, Garfield Drew was a man of remarkable insight. He has been identified as “the man chiefly responsible for [the] popularization, refinement and interpretation, the Christopher Columbus of the  Odd Lot Theory.” To Time magazine he was the “Small Investor’s Boswell.” (Editor’s note: a “Boswell” is a constant companion and observer, referring to the 18th century English author James Boswell.)

Drew attended Harvard College and began his professional life as a bond statistician during 1929, at the very beginning of the challenging investment environment created by the Great Depression. The year 1935 was one of the ten years Martin Fridson wrote of in It Was a Very Good Year, as the DJIA rose 47.66% and it was also a very good year for Garfield Drew. Drew was one of ten winners, out of 435 who had submitted “manuscripts” or articles, in Barron’s Open Forum stock-selection contest “for the professional.” He won $100, and his article was published in Barron’s July 22, 1935 issue.

For the contest, Drew selected five small company stocks (including Liquid Carbonic) essentially relying upon fundamental analysis, exhibiting the influence of Graham & Dodd, whose Security Analysis had been published a year earlier. This article predated his work on odd lots. In his article, Drew succinctly expressed his investment approach:

“I favor above everything else the clean-cut situations of small, efficient companies which are frankly operating to make money – and are making it.”

Like John Magee, Drew enjoyed being away from Wall Street. He once said, “What’s the point of being in Wall Street? Out here you’re aloof from the scuttlebutt, the emotions and social entanglements of life in a financial district.” In the late 1930’s, he went to work for Babson’s United Business Service in Boston, where he lived for most of his life. While working with that firm, he discovered odd lots.

In developing the theory of odd lots, Drew had followed a tradition of market analysis by researching newly available exchange data. It was in 1936 that the daily record of odd lot purchases and sales data began to be kept and officially released, and in 1939 odd lot short sales of the public and exchange members became available. Although earlier published odd lot data going back to 1920 is available, that data is from a 1939 study by the Brookings Institution using monthly odd lot data. By 1940, Drew had the officially tabulated data on odd lots, and he began his studies.

Drew wrote one book, New Methods for Profit in the Stock Market, originally published in 1941, and revised in 1948 and 1955. The book offers a rich historical perspective of technical methods at a time when technical analysis was enjoying heady years. It is truly a gem of a book, and is well worth reading. New Methods for Profit in the Stock Market is a review of the technical theories and systems then popular. Among others, Drew described Lyman Lowry’s Buying Power and Selling Pressure, Quinn’s Volume work, Formula methods, cycles, Elliott’s Wave Principle, Odd Lots, and the Contrary Opinion ideas of his good friend Humphrey Neill, “the Ruminator.”

It was in his 1941 book that Drew introduced his odd lot studies and his two better known indicators: the Balance Index, a 10-day moving average of the ratio of odd lot purchases to odd lot sales, and the Short Sales Index, a 5-day moving average of the ratio of the number of shares sold short in odd lots to all odd lot sales. Today, these indicators would be classified as contrary opinion sentiment indicators.

As if to summarize odd lot theory in a single paragraph, Drew wrote:

Thus, although the public is never “wrong” in the sense that it buys around every bottom, it is almost invariably wrong in that it buys proportionately less at the bottom than it did on the way down. Similarly, as an advance progresses towards its peak, selling may either become less or change to actual buying. A change of sentiment on the part of the public after any market trend has become well established is almost always just the opposite of what it should be.

Drew wrote an article in the June 25, 1962 issue of Barron’s entitled “The Misunderstood Odd-Lotter.” The article reinforced many of the guidelines Drew had stated about odd lot trading 21 years earlier. Interestingly, Drew wrote his 1962 article at a time when a massive shift in the behavior of odd lotters occurred. Odd lot trading went from net buying to net selling. During the 25 years prior to 1962, odd lot buying was greater than odd lot selling in 21 of the 25 years. During the 25 years after 1962, odd lot selling was greater than odd lot buying in 24 of the 25 years. It was a complete reversal of trading activity by odd lotters.

Shortly before Drew passed away, Bill Doane had the honor of presenting the 1982 MTA Award to Drew at Drew’s house. Drew was then in poor health. The tape, in which he accepted the MTA Annual Award at his home was destroyed on September 11, 2001 but it was very short, less than 20 words, just a “thank you.” He died in 1985, at 82 years of age.

It is interesting to note that an indicator that had worked so well for so many years (odd lots) broke down in the 1970s never to regain its once rich usefulness. Odd lot buying and selling has declined substantially as a percentage of all transactions from the mid-1930s to the 1990s. Perhaps one of the readers of this newsletter can take a fresh look at odd lot data in conjunction with structural market changes and offer some new perspectives. 

Contributor(s)

George A. Schade, Jr., CMT

George A. Schade, Jr., who holds a Chartered Market Technician (CMT) designation, has written extensively about the people and innovations that have advanced the field of technical analysis within financial markets. A member of the CMT Association since 1987, he has written about...

Garfield Drew on Odd Lot Indicators

Drew disagreed with the popular misconception, highlighted by the media, that odd lot investors were “always wrong.” He advocated a deeper analysis:

  1. Odd-lot trading represents speculative activity, as it is carried out by small investors.
  2. Odd-lot investors don’t initiate trends. They join a rising or a declining trend after the trend has started and has become well-established.
  3. The balance of odd-lot buying and selling should be maintained. A ratio of Sales/Purchases is the best representation of the balance.
  4. Odd-lot indexes have an excellent record in pointing the climactic bottoms, but not as good in pointing the tops.
  5. It is not the levels of odd-lot buying and selling that count, but rather the trend of sentiment indicated by the balance of odd-lot trading that is important.
  6. Pay attention to sudden and significant changes in the levels of odd-lot buying and selling, as a change in trend may be occur.
  7. Odd-lot indexes are not perfect indicators.

Contributor(s)

The Rate of Change (ROC) Indicator

The Rate of Change (ROC) indicator calculates the difference between the current price and the price at some point in the past. The difference is usually expressed as a percentage. ROC is commonly displayed as an oscillator. As prices increase, ROC rises; as prices fall, ROC declines. ROC may be calculated over any timeframe and using data from any time period.

According to Steven B. Achelis in Technical Analysis from A to Z, the most popular time periods are the 12- and 25-day ROC for short to intermediate-term trading. He states that these time periods were popularized by Gerald Appel and Fred Hitschler in their book, Stock Market Trading Systems. Achelis further notes that the 12-day ROC tends to be very cyclical and finds it useful to anticipate price changes based upon the leading nature of this indicator.

At Financial Trend Forecaster (www.fintrend.com), Editor Tim McMahon applies ROC to the NASDAQ and NYSE as a mechanical trend following system. In his words, “The NASDAQ ROC chart shows the annual rate of return along the left axis and the years since 1990 along the bottom. It is plotted against its 12-month moving average.

As with most moving averages a buy signal is generated as the index crosses above the moving average and a sell signal is generated as the index crosses below the moving average.

This chart has one other feature and that is that the best buy signals come from a movement from below the 0% line. This allows you to capture the greatest up move. While viewing this chart we must remember that it represents the rate of return we would have earned if we had been holding the entire NASDAQ for the previous 12 months.

Since this chart shows the rate of return rather than the current price it is much easier to see performance, we don’t have to guess if we are up or down from last year. If we are below the zero line… we are down, if we are above the zero line… we are up. The key is to exit positions while in positive territory and reenter when we get a buy signal.”

Current Analysis, provided by Tim:

“The NASDAQ index is up only .46% from last year. In other words it is basically flat for an entire 12 months and if you take into consideration the 3.26% inflation you would have lost about 3% by holding the NASDAQ last year.

The ROC generated a sell signal last April. So if you followed it you would have been out of the NASDAQ during this flat period. We are still watching for the NASDAQ to generate a buy signal. With the index at the zero line we are setting up for a good buy signal. Once the moving average drops a little lower and the index turns up we might see some decent action.”

Backtesting on the NASDAQ Composite Index shows that this simple methodology would outperform a buy-and-hold strategy by about 67% and significantly reduce drawdown. This indicator has provided 14 buy signals since 1987, with 11 winners (78.6%):

Contributor(s)

Michael Carr, CMT

Mike Carr, who holds a Chartered Market Technician (CMT) designation, is a full-time trader and contributing editor for Banyan Hill Publishing, a leading investment newsletter service. He is an instructor at the New York Institute of Finance and a contributor to various additional...

Snowbound in San Diego with the MTA

Over the weekend of January 21-23 the MTA hosted it first annual mid-winter retreat in warm and sunny San Diego, CA. Our timing was perfect as the worst blizzard of the century was pummeling the East Coast with over a foot of snow. The retreat was attended by about 50 individuals who gathered for round table sessions and keynote presentations by two leading technicians. The keynote lunch sessions were presented by John Bollinger and Richard Russell, perfectly underscoring how both the “art” and “science” camps of our field have made major contributions to our craft. Attendees represented a mix of traders, sellside analysts, consultants and portfolio managers. Topics ranged from the presidential cycle, to DeMark to Elliott.

In his keynote speech, John Bollinger paid tribute to the decades of contributions by the late Art Merrill. John explained how Mr. Merrill was a major contributor to our field, despite the fact that he did not become a technician until after retiring from a career with General Electric as an engineer. In his work, Merrill delineated the many statistical relationships in the market, using his extensive mathematical knowledge from his engineering days. In the last decade of his life, Merrill dedicated himself to writing a book on statistics designed to teach their use and interpretation. John is now working to complete this book for publication. With the recent addition of statistics to the CMT body of knowledge, it is hoped that Mr. Merrill’s book can be put into print to educate the next generation of technicians about the science behind our craft.

As Richard Russell stepped up to the podium, his attire epitomized the laid back Californian he has become in his decades of living in the San Diego area. His bearish outlook on the market was not nearly so laid back. Mr. Russell is one of the foremost authorities on Dow Theory and under his current interpretation, we are due for a fairly severe continuation of the bear market that has already begun. He was equally bearish on the outlook for most commodities and for international equity markets. The two assets he did recommend as safe investment alternatives were gold and treasury bills.

The conference was organized as a series of informal exchanges of ideas, led by practitioners in their fields. Financial radio commentator Gabe Wisdom came prepared with detailed information on cycles and led the discussion on the presidential cycle. In this session, the participants widely agreed that the decennial cycle, under which every year ending in a 5 has seen positive performance in the equities markets, is not valid since there have only been about a dozen data points. In the session on sentiment, Phil Roth played the role of teacher fielding participants’ questions on the sentiment and flow of funds data that he has analyzed for years. Mr. Roth even shared some of his secrets on where to find this data. Steve Poser, who recently penned a book on Elliott Wave Principle, led the discussion in this area. As the tall ships paraded past in San Diego Harbor and sounded their cannons, Jeannette Young shared some of the trading secrets that allow her to make a living in the New York Board of Trade pits. Even seasoned technicians like Phil Roth and Ralph Acampora seemed to appreciate Jeanette’s insights. Chris Ruspi, who is well-known to CMT candidates for his CMT prep webcasts, walked his participants through case studies in using technical analysis. Ken Tower made a number of key points and shared his knowledge of point and figure charting. Ken’s presentation on one of the older methods in our field nicely complemented Rick Bensignor’s session on a newer topic, Tom DeMark models. Twenty five hundred miles away from the blizzard that was ravaging his home in Massachusetts, Mike Epstein shared his insights from his fascinating career on Wall Street and his new occupation in academia in discussing Modern Portfolio Theory. Participants in this session walked through a history of trading and commissions in the markets and shared their thoughts on the future.

While the formal sessions were great, the highlights were the informal sessions. For years, many MTA members have come to conferences to network, meeting new friends and renewing old acquaintances. This conference was no different. Over cocktails Friday on a deck overlooking San Diego harbor, young and old members mixed. At least one affiliate was able to secure sponsorships to full membership. Dinner was a wonderful feast of gourmet food and desserts and the wine flowed until early morning.

For next year, the seminar committee is planning to hold another high-level retreat in Miami Beach over the weekend of January 20-22, 2006. May 19-22 is the date for the MTA Education Seminar 2005 in the historic Hotel Pennsylvania in New York City. This promises to be a great opportunity for financial professionals to learn about technical analysis and join our organization and for our affiliates pursuing the CMT charter to brush up on their skills. Watch the MTA website for details.

Contributor(s)

Barry M. Sine, CFA, CMT

Barry M. Sine, who holds a Chartered Market Technician (CMT) designation, is the Managing Director of Equity Research at Dawson James Securities. He previously served in the same role at Drexel Hamilton, LLC, in the firm’s Research Division. Barry was formerly Director...

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) of the Chartered Market Technician (CMTSM) Program

These Frequently Asked Questions include information about the CMT exams and program, as well as study advice for all levels, grading information, etc. Please let us know if there is a FAQ that you wish to see answered, as we will update this report from time to time.

Q. What is the length of the exams?

  • Level 1 – 2 hours
  • Level 2 – 4 hours
  • Level 3 – 4 hours

Q. What is the format of the exams?

  • Level 1 – 120 multiple choice questions
  • Level 2 – 150 multiple choice questions
  • Level 3 – essay – the entire exam is worth 240 points and candidates are allowed 240 minutes, so candidates should pace their progress so that they do not spend too much time on minor questions and so that they do allow time for more time consuming questions.

Q. What is required of the candidate in the exams?

  • Level 1 – Primarily definitions, this exam is designed to measure basic, entry-level competence and tests concepts such as terminology, charting methods and ethics.
  • Level 2 – Focuses on application of technical analysis. Candidates should understand ethics and more complex theories (e.g., Dow Theory, Elliott Wave, intermarket, etc.).
  • Level 3 – Tests candidates’ competency in ethics and in rendering technical opinions integrating multiple aspects of technical analysis. Essay responses should be of the quality of technical research published by practicing CMT charterholders.

Q. How study much time does it typically take candidates to prepare for the exams?

  • Level 1 – 100 hours
  • Level 2 – 140 hours
  • Level 3 – 160 hours

Q. How long do candidates have to achieve the requirements of all three levels of the CMT program?

Five (5) years from the date of registration.

Q. What happens if a candidate misses an exam?

There are no refunds of exam fees, and exam fees are not applied to the next exam sitting.

Q. Are candidates required to memorize ALL formulas contained in the required readings?

Candidates do not need to memorize ALL formulas; however, a solid understanding of technical indicators such as moving averages and oscillators does require a working knowledge of the formula used to calculate the indicator. Therefore, candidates should memorize the formulas used to construct most widely used technical indicators. The exam does not cover programming of various technical software platforms and any detailed formulas used in constructing trading systems need not be memorized.

Q. Do candidates have to memorize ALL Japanese terms for candlestick charting patterns?

Candidates should know the Japanese terms such as Doji and Harami commonly used by textbook authors. More obscure and infrequently used Japanese terms are not tested.

Q. Is ALL material in suggested readings covered in exams?

No. Each version of the CMT exam is designed to test a representative sample of the body of knowledge. Any given version of the exam will only have a limited number of questions and therefore can only cover a limited amount of material. Therefore, some specific areas may not be covered in exams. Each level of the CMT exam is carefully prepared to ensure that they have the same level of difficulty. Candidates must also be able to retain and build upon prior knowledge.

Q. Will ALL material tested be contained in the suggested readings?

No. While the suggested readings are compiled to cover as much of the body of knowledge as possible, certain areas tested in the CMT exams may not have been covered in the readings. Candidates are responsible to seek out other sources of information such as the Internet, other readings, colleagues and technical analysis message boards to gain a full and complete understanding of all material which may be tested on the CMT exams.

Q. How are the exams graded?

  • Level 1 and 2 exams are machine graded since they are multiple choice. The MTA uses the services of Chauncey/Thomson Prometrics to ensure that exam questions fairly test candidates on the subject matter. Their analysis includes a post-exam assessment of all exam questions using statistical techniques to identify and eliminate any questions which have produced an unusually high number of wrong answers.
  • Level 3 exams are graded by experienced CMT charterholders typically including textbook authors, MTA board members and committee chairpersons. Grading is based on a uniform answer key for each question which indicates the information which must be contained in candidates’ questions and how many points each part of a question is worth. After all exams are graded, all exams which are close to, but below passing level, are completely regraded to ensure that grading was in compliance with the answer key and that all possible points were awarded.

Q. What is the passing score for each level of the exam?

While the passing score is generally approximately 70%, the actual passing score is adjusted as certain questions which generated unusually low scores among most candidates are eliminated (questions can be eliminated due to errors, unclear wording, inconsistency with reading materials and other factors). The MTA does not provide the actual passing score for exams.

Q. Why does the MTA not provide the actual score for passing scores?

There are several reasons for this policy. First, as noted, the final passing score is based on a statistical process so the passing percentage changes from one version of the exam to the next. Second, the MTA has found from experience that providing this information is counter-productive. Candidates have too often repeatedly contacted MTA staff attempting to obtain a CMT charter by arguing about the process, rather than demonstrating a solid understanding of technical analysis through their performance on the exams. The MTA staff has no authority to changes exam results and should be spending its time on more pressing matters.

Q. What is the process for challenging a failing score?

Keep in mind that Level 1 and 2 exams are machine graded and double checked for grading accuracy. All borderline Level 3 exams are automatically regraded. For a fee of $100, the MTA will review and regrade a candidate’s CMT 3 [essay] exam. After regrading, candidates receive personalized feedback indicating problems areas such as which answers were unclear or incomplete.

Q. What are the common mistakes failing candidates generally make on the exams?

  • Level 1 – As this level of the exam is relatively straightforward, it appears that unsuccessful candidates have not sufficiently familiarized themselves with the material covered. Many candidates overlook studying the MTA Code of Ethics as they spend all their study time on the assigned textbooks. Ethics is an important part of all three levels of the CMT exam process.
  • Level 2 – At this level unsuccessful candidates appear not to have developed as complete an understanding of technical analysis as is required. Candidates should understand how various indicators are constructed and how this impacts the interpretation of the indicator. One common mistake is confusing similar terms such as RSI and relative strength.
  • Level 3 – Unsuccessful candidates at this level have not been able to produce coherent essays supporting a technical opinion using multiple technical tools. When answering level 3 questions, consider the style and quality of research reports produced by practicing CMTs.
    • a) Frequently, candidates will fail to clearly state an opinion when one is clearly required by the question. This causes candidates to lose a significant number of points since, if candidates do not clearly state an opinion, they then are unable to respond to questions asking them to defend this opinion. Remember, many times in technical analysis multiple interpretations are possible and candidates can be awarded points for a variety of opinions on many questions.
    • b) Candidates also tend to focus only on a portion of a chart and fail to utilize all indicators to demonstrate an ability to integrate multiple aspects of technical analysis. For example, in discussing Elliott Wave counts, candidates often ignore other chart aspects such as oscillators, moving averages and support/resistance levels.
    • c) Unsuccessful candidates often consistently provide essay answers which are not up to the level of professionalism expected of a CMT charter holder. In order to maintain the quality of the CMT charter, the Accreditation Committee seeks to ensure that successful candidates, who will be awarded the CMT designation, can professionally provide technical opinions in a manner that will be a credit to the entire CMT program.
    • d) Additionally, candidates at levels 2 and 3 are responsible for all material tested on prior exam levels. For example, Point and Figure charting is typically explained in level 1 readings, but may not be utilized in the level 3 readings. This does not mean that Point and Figure charting is not tested on level 3 and, in fact, the level 3 exam is designed so as to include the maximum number of chart types, and indicators possible.

Q. What other sources of information should candidates refer to in order to better understand the exam material?

Candidates should refer to textbooks or web sites other than those assigned in the readings if they come across material which they are having difficulty with. Often, an explanation by a different author aids in understanding. The MTA also maintains a forum where CMT candidates can discuss the exam material. Additionally, many candidates have commented that they gained a better understanding of the material by reading all of the assigned textbooks, even if only certain chapters were specifically assigned. One general technical analysis reference source which is often used by candidates is the Encyclopedia of Technical Indicators by Robert Colby.

Q. Once a candidate completes all three levels of the CMT program, what other requirements are there in order to receive the CMT charter?

Only full members (as opposed to affiliates) of the MTA may be awarded the CMT designation and charter. The MTA member application process is separate from the CMT program. Candidates who have completed the three levels of the CMT program need only demonstrate three years of acceptable work experience rather than the five years normally required. Due to the time consuming nature of the member application process, it is strongly recommended that candidates submit their application for membership as soon as they meet the eligibility requirements and know the three MTA members who will sponsor the candidate for member status. 

Q. How is the CMT designation actually conferred and when do I receive my physical charter document?

The CMT designation is granted by the MTA Board of Directors. Successful candidates who are full members are recommended to the Board at the next monthly board meeting and a vote is held. You will receive a letter in the postal mail confirming this, and you will also receive a CMT charter certificate. These certificates are ordered annually and mailed to candidates. Candidates may also purchase special CMT charter frames at their own expense from a vendor which provides discounted framing services to MTA members. 

Q. Once a CMT charter is awarded, to which requirements must a charter holder adhere?

In order to maintain the CMT designation, you must be a member in good standing of the Market Technicians Association (MTA), or if outside the USA, you may be a member of your local technical analysis society if it is in turn a Member Society of the International Federation of Technical Analysts (IFTA). In the case of the latter, a CMT maintenance fee would be paid to the MTA, and the individual would be required to sign the annual Professional Conduct Statement that same as any current member of the MTA.

Q. Under what circumstances can a CMT charter be revoked?

The MTA Board of Directors, acting under the advice of the Ethics Committee, may revoke a member’s CMT charter for serious violations of the MTA Code of Ethics.

Contributor(s)

CMT Stats

As of January 31, 2005 there are 342 people who have received the CMT designation. Of this number, 47 have both the CFA and CMT designations.

These numbers are not a misprint. There was an article written a few months ago that said there were 350 people who had both CMT and CFA, but it was obviously incorrect.

TO ALL CFAs – please make sure you are in the count of those who have received CFA and CMT designations. Check your record in the MTA database to see if your CFA is there. If not, send an email to cmt@mta.org asking to have it added to your name.

The Accreditation Committee reports the following passing rates for the November 2004 CMT exams:

CMT Level 1 76%
CMT Level 2 61%
CMT Level 3 33%

Congratulations to the following who were granted the CMT designation since the last report in the January/February 2004 issue of Technically Speaking:

  • Amir Arif
  • Richard Audet
  • Timothy P. Bradley
  • Michael Breedlove
  • Frank N. Cappelleri
  • Hendrik Jan Davids
  • Jonathan Dean
  • James V. Debevec II
  • Mark Deriet
  • Vance Derryberry
  • Thomas J. Festa
  • Howard Friend
  • Thomas S. Galikowski
  • George Garrison
  • David Gonzalez
  • Stephen D. Goodman
  • Homan Haghighi
  • Angela M. Helbig
  • Faris P. Hitti
  • Steve Hoffman
  • Blethyn Hulton
  • Tracy L. Knudsen
  • Qi Feng Lau
  • Clifton Lee
  • Ari-Ben Kirschbaum
  • Jeffery F. Moy
  • J. C. Muns
  • Eric R. Olander
  • Carl Parent
  • Vikram Patel
  • Jason Prole
  • Christopher M. Ruspi
  • Jorge Manuel
  • Santos Jose Serruya
  • A. Mark B. Stevenson
  • Charles Trafton
  • Gaurang S. Trivedi
  • René vanMourik
  • Eric R. Wellmann
  • Christopher A. Wilson

Contributor(s)